DISTRICT OF HIGHLANDS
NOTICE OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 4, 2012 @ 7pm School House, 1589 Millstream Road |
|||
|
|||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Adopt |
a) |
Special Council – May 14, 2012 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt |
|
|
b) |
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt |
|
Receive |
c) |
DRAFT - Fiscal & Environmental Select Committee – May 2, 2012 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive |
|
|
d) |
Capital Regional District Board Minutes – May 9, 2012 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive |
|
|
e) |
Capital Regional District Hospital Board Minutes – May 9, 2012 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive |
|
|
|
||
|
a) |
i) |
Councillor Allen Dobb CRD Arts; Heritage Task Force, Sustainability Strategy Advisory Committee |
|
|
ii) |
Councillor Diane Gill Community Infrastructure Services Select Committee, CRD Solid Waste Advisory |
|
|
iii) |
Councillor Sigurd Johannesen Community Centre Task Force; Emergency Planning, Greater Victoria Family Court, Community Policing, CRD Water Commission |
|
|
iv) |
Councillor Marcie McLean Fiscal Environmental, Inter-municipal Advisory Committee on Disability Issues (IACDI) |
|
|
v) |
Councillor Karel Roessingh Advisory Planning Commission, Capital Region Emergency Service Telecommunications (CREST), Greater Victoria Public Library Board, Ground Water Task Force |
|
|
vi) |
Councillor Ken Williams West Shore Parks &Recreation, Community Centre Task Force, JDF Water Commission |
|
b) |
Mayor’s Report |
|
5. |
|
||
6. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
RE: REZONING APPLICATION RZ-03-11 (1289 Millstream Road) RECOMMENDATION: That Council give Bylaw No. 349 first and second readings and schedule a public hearing for 7pm July 16, 2012, immediately preceding the regularly scheduled Council Meeting. |
|
|
|
REZONING APPLICATION OCP-03-10 / RZ-02-10 (Lot C, Sections 30 and 74, Rowntree and Gowlland Roads) RECOMMENDATION: That Council rescind first reading to Bylaw 346; That Council rescind second reading to Bylaw 346; That Council give first reading to Bylaw 346 as amended; That Council give second reading to Bylaw 346 as amended; That the public hearing scheduled for June 18, 2012 immediately preceding the regularly scheduled Council meeting, include Bylaw 346 as amended; and That Council authorized the execution of the restrictive covenant between Highlands 3 Holdings and the District noted as Option B. Report | Biological Report | PGL Sustainability Plan | Mary Lake x Section |
|
|
|
||
|
|
RE: COMMUNITY OUTREACH PREVENTION EDUCATION PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT 2011-12 (4710-02) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
a) |
RE: WEST SHORE PARKS AND RECREATION SOCIETY (3900-342) FEES AND CHARGES BYLAW NO. 342, 2012 RECOMMENDATION: That Council Rescind First, Second, and Third Reading of Bylaw No. 342, 2012, and That Council give First, Second, and Third Reading to Bylaw No. 342, 2012 as amended. |
|
|
|
||
|
a) |
Memo – C. Leek, Building Official – May 30, 2012 RE: ACCESSORY BUILDINGS EXCEEDING TOTAL ALLOWABLE BUILDING SIZE/EXPIRED PERMITS (1835 Millstream Rd) RECOMMENDATION: Please refer to report for full recommendation |
|
|
b) |
Memo – L. Beckett, Planner – May 22, 2012 RE: ROAD NAME REQUEST – “YORK RIDGE” (3900-348) RECOMMENDATION: That Council give Bylaw No.348, 2012 first, second, and third readings. |
|
|
c) |
Memo – L. Beckett, Planner – May 29, 2012 RE: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING, WITH POTENTIAL TO CONVENE TO COUNCIL MEETING – JUNE 25, 2012 (1150 Bear Mountain Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: That Council may wish to accommodate request. This has been done in the past due to the reduced Council summer schedule. Alternately, Council may wish to remain with the fixed Council and Committee of the Whole 2012 schedule. This means the applicant could return to Council at the regularly scheduled meeting on Monday, July 16, 2012. |
|
|
Motion: That Council move In Camera to discuss items pursuant to the Community Charter, 90(1)(f) law enforcement if the council considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of an enactment (bylaw enforcement); and 90(1)(k) negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality if they were held in public |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||